This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 1770–1781, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.168
Scheme 1: Schematic illustration of the formation process of the hexagonal magnetic mesoporous nanoplates.
Figure 1: XRD patterns of: (a) pure CoAl LDH; (b) LDH@PDA-2.5 composite; (c–e) the NPLs prepared by carboniza...
Figure 2: SEM images of: (A) pure CoAl LDH; (B) LDH@PDA-2.5 composite; (C) NPLs-2.5-800, the inset shows a hi...
Figure 3: (A–C) TEM images of the hexagonal mesoporous sample NPLs-2.5-800, the inset in (B) shows the corres...
Figure 4: (A) and (B) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the NPLs prepared under different condition...
Figure 5: (A) Magnetization curves of the nanoplate samples prepared by carbonization of LDH@PDA at (a–c) 800...
Figure 6: (A) Raman spectrum and (B–D) XPS spectra of the hexagonal magnetic mesoporous sample NPLs-2.5-800. ...
Figure 7: (A) UV–vis spectra of the solution after adsorption of RhB for 2 h in the absence of any adsorbents...
Figure 8: (A) Relationship between the adsorption ability of the hexagonal NPLs-2.5-800 sample and time at di...
Figure 9: Recyclability of the NPLs adsorbents towards the removal of RhB. The concentration of adsorbents is...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 1677–1685, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.159
Figure 1: XRD patterns of S, ZnO@NCNT and S/ZnO@NCNT composite.
Figure 2: TGA curve of the S/ZnO@NCNT composite.
Figure 3: (a) HRTEM image; (b) SAED patterns; (c) TEM image; (d–g) EDX mapping images of the ZnO@NCNT composi...
Figure 4: (a) SEM image; (b–f) EDX mapping; (g,h) TEM images of S/ZnO@NCNT composite.
Figure 5: XPS spectra of S/ZnO@NCNT composite.
Figure 6: Discharge/charge voltage profiles of the S/ZnO@NCNT cathode for the initial three cycles at 0.2C.
Figure 7: Cycling performance of the S/ZnO@NCNT cathode at 0.2C.
Figure 8: Long-term cycle life of the S/ZnO@NCNT cathode at 1C.
Figure 9: The performance comparison of S/ZnO@NCNT electrodes with sulfur loadings of 2.5, 3.25, 4.0 and 4.75...
Figure 10: Rate capability of the S/ZnO@NCNT composite cathode.
Figure 11: Discharge/charge voltage profiles of S/ZnO@NCNT composite cathode at various rates.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 776–783, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.69
Figure 1: XRD patterns of NaTaO3 nanocubes.
Figure 2: SEM images of NaTaO3 nanocubes: (a) 1M-NaTaO3, (b) 2M-NaTaO3, (c) 3M-NaTaO3, and (d) 4M-NaTaO3.
Figure 3: UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (a) and optical absorption band edges (b) of NaTaO3 nanocubes.
Figure 4: XRD patterns of 2M-NaTaO3 nanocubes loaded with different amounts of CuO.
Figure 5: SEM images of CuO–NaTaO3 nanocubes: (a) 2M-NaTaO3, (b) 1wt-NaTaO3, (c) 2wt-NaTaO3, and (d) 5wt-NaTaO...
Figure 6: UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra of CuO-loaded 2M-NaTaO3 nanocubes.
Figure 7: EDS spectrum of 5wt-NaTaO3.
Figure 8: Smoothed Cu 2p XPS peaks 2M-NaTaO3, 2wt-NaTaO3 and 5wt-NaTaO3.
Figure 9: Methanol and acetone yields for 2M-NaTaO3 loaded with different amounts of CuO after 6 h of irradia...
Figure 10: Schematic diagram for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to methanol in CuO–NaTaO3 photocatalyst under...